Individual skill

self-reflection

Build agents that critique and improve their own outputs — reflection loops, Reflexion-style memory, and verbal reinforcement.

skills/self-reflection/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit faf37c0859ebf627bfcb5225e8057d088691e0ae

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 8, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
54
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

## Overview

Self-reflection gives a language model a second pass over its own work: generate,
critique, revise. The critique can target correctness ("does this code pass the
tests?"), quality ("is this summary faithful?"), or strategy ("is this plan
actually going to work?"). Unlike gradient-based learning, reflection improves the
output within a single episode using only inference — the model reads its own
draft the way an editor reads a manuscript, spots problems, and fixes them.

The research lineage runs from simple "review your answer" prompts through
Reflexion — which stores reflections as episodic memory across trials, so the
agent learns from past failures without weight updates — to verbal reinforcement
methods where the model maintains textual "lessons learned." The pattern is most
powerful when the critique is grounded: test results, tool outputs, or retrieved