Individual skill
self-reflection
Build agents that critique and improve their own outputs — reflection loops, Reflexion-style memory, and verbal reinforcement.
skills/self-reflection/SKILL.md
Source commit faf37c0859ebf627bfcb5225e8057d088691e0ae
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 8, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 54
- Repository last updated
- Oct 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-agents-automation Repository topic
- ai-skills Repository topic
- awesome Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- chatgpt Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- meta-ai Repository topic
- muse-ai Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
## Overview
Self-reflection gives a language model a second pass over its own work: generate,
critique, revise. The critique can target correctness ("does this code pass the
tests?"), quality ("is this summary faithful?"), or strategy ("is this plan
actually going to work?"). Unlike gradient-based learning, reflection improves the
output within a single episode using only inference — the model reads its own
draft the way an editor reads a manuscript, spots problems, and fixes them.
The research lineage runs from simple "review your answer" prompts through
Reflexion — which stores reflections as episodic memory across trials, so the
agent learns from past failures without weight updates — to verbal reinforcement
methods where the model maintains textual "lessons learned." The pattern is most
powerful when the critique is grounded: test results, tool outputs, or retrieved