Individual skill
stock-analysis
Produce a rigorous, sector-relative, multi-factor fundamental analysis of a publicly listed company — Indian (NSE/BSE) or US/global. Use when the user asks to analyse, research, evaluate, or value a stock, ticker, or listed company; asks whether a business is fundamentally strong, cheap, or expensive; compares companies or benchmarks one against its sector; or mentions OPM, ROCE, ROE, ROIC, P/E, EV/EBITDA, free cash flow, NIM, GNPA, CASA, promoter holding or pledging. Use it for accounting-quality and forensic questions — "is the profit real", "why is profit rising but cash isn't", auditor qualifications, related-party concerns — which route to the forensic-only mode, and for IPOs and not-yet-listed companies — "should I apply to this IPO", DRHP/RHP or S-1 questions, price band, grey market premium — which route to the IPO mode. Use it even when the request sounds casual ("is Infosys any good?"). Do not use it for personalised investment advice, portfolio allocation, or trading signals.
skills-imported/stock-analysis/SKILL.md
Source commit faf37c0859ebf627bfcb5225e8057d088691e0ae
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 8, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 56
- Repository last updated
- Oct 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-agents-automation Repository topic
- ai-skills Repository topic
- awesome Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- chatgpt Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- meta-ai Repository topic
- muse-ai Repository topic
- finance Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 34,292 bytesreferences/01-data-sourcing.mddoc · 39,390 bytesreferences/02-core-factors.mddoc · 50,480 bytesreferences/03-earnings-quality.mddoc · 41,098 bytesreferences/04-balance-sheet-and-cashflow.mddoc · 57,983 bytesreferences/05-returns-and-dupont.mddoc · 50,950 bytesreferences/06-valuation.mddoc · 54,945 bytesreferences/07-forensic-red-flags.mddoc · 58,868 bytesreferences/08-governance.mddoc · 68,594 bytesreferences/09-risk-and-macro.mddoc · 53,927 bytesreferences/10-peer-set.mddoc · 46,571 bytesreferences/11-scoring-rubric.mddoc · 37,658 bytesreferences/12-report-template.mddoc · 27,279 bytesreferences/13-situations.mddoc · 62,087 bytesreferences/14-accounting-comparability.mddoc · 49,750 bytesreferences/15-document-diligence.mddoc · 77,915 bytesreferences/16-market-mechanics-and-tax.mddoc · 49,753 bytesreferences/17-process-and-epistemics.mddoc · 61,043 bytesreferences/18-forensic-mode.mddoc · 16,855 bytesreferences/19-ipo-mode.mddoc · 15,991 bytesreferences/20-challenge-pass.mddoc · 14,396 bytesreferences/21-data-integrity-tools.mddoc · 7,418 bytesreferences/sectors/_index.mddoc · 69,403 bytesreferences/sectors/auto.mddoc · 48,622 bytesreferences/sectors/aviation-hotels.mddoc · 50,455 bytesreferences/sectors/banks.mddoc · 39,533 bytesreferences/sectors/biotech-clinical.mddoc · 48,986 bytesreferences/sectors/chemicals-cement.mddoc · 47,349 bytesreferences/sectors/exchanges-payments.mddoc · 42,154 bytesreferences/sectors/fmcg-consumer.mddoc · 36,590 bytesreferences/sectors/holdco-assetmgr.mddoc · 42,349 bytesreferences/sectors/infra-capitalgoods.mddoc · 44,011 bytesreferences/sectors/insurance-brokers-services.mddoc · 51,065 bytesreferences/sectors/insurance.mddoc · 38,915 bytesreferences/sectors/it-saas.mddoc · 45,388 bytesreferences/sectors/metals-mining.mddoc · 50,556 bytesreferences/sectors/mortgage-reit-specialty-finance.mddoc · 44,578 bytesreferences/sectors/nbfc.mddoc · 41,264 bytesreferences/sectors/oil-gas.mddoc · 44,548 bytesreferences/sectors/people-businesses.mddoc · 47,371 bytesreferences/sectors/pharma-healthcare.mddoc · 41,610 bytesreferences/sectors/rail-freight.mddoc · 67,802 bytesreferences/sectors/realestate-reit.mddoc · 45,388 bytesreferences/sectors/retail-ecommerce.mddoc · 49,480 bytesreferences/sectors/semiconductors.mddoc · 44,209 bytesreferences/sectors/shipping-logistics.mddoc · 48,302 bytesreferences/sectors/telecom-media.mddoc · 44,154 bytesreferences/sectors/utilities-power.mddoc · 45,941 bytesreferences/sectors/waste-environmental.mddoc · 47,612 bytesscripts/benchmarks.jsonasset · 205,316 bytesscripts/lint_report.pyruns · 48,978 bytesscripts/ratios.pyruns · 130,419 bytesscripts/score.pyruns · 99,127 bytesscripts/valuation.pyruns · 38,760 bytesscripts/verify_data.pyruns · 74,276 bytes
Read excerpt
# Stock Analysis
Produce an evidence-backed fundamental analysis of one company, benchmarked against the right peers, and delivered as a written report plus a sector-relative scorecard.
## The principle that governs everything here
**A financial metric carries no meaning until you know the sector it came from and the company's own history.**
If X earns a 20% operating margin and Y earns 30%, that tells you nothing about which is the better business. Y may be in software (where 30% is mediocre) and X in distribution (where 20% is exceptional). Y's 30% may need three times the capital to produce, so X earns a far higher return on the money invested. Y's margin may be eroding while X's compounds.
Two consequences shape this whole skill:
1. **Never rank companies on a single metric.** Every judgement combines profitability, returns on capital, cash conversion, balance sheet, growth durability, governance, and price.
2. **Compare like with like.** Benchmark against sector peers or against the company's own multi-year record — never a raw cross-industry number. For banks, insurers, REITs and miners the standard ratios are not merely less useful, they are *undefined or inverted*; those sectors need their own metric set entirely.