Menu

Individual skill

peer-review-checklist

0upvotes

Conducting rigorous peer review — structured evaluation, major vs minor issues, and writing reviews authors can act on.

skills/peer-review-checklist/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit faf37c0859ebf627bfcb5225e8057d088691e0ae

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 8, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
56
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

## Overview

Peer review is quality control for science: the reviewer's job is to
judge whether the claims are supported and the work is sound — not to
rewrite the paper or gatekeep the field. This skill covers structuring
a review (summary, major issues, minor issues), evaluating novelty,
methods, statistics, and interpretation separately, and writing criticism
that improves the paper.

## When to use

- Reviewing a manuscript for a journal or conference
- Deciding on a recommendation: accept, minor/major revision, reject
- Separating fatal flaws from fixable issues from nits
Back to top