Individual skill
seo-content
Evaluate page content for usefulness, E-E-A-T, readability, thinness, and AI citation readiness, plus last-mile draft cleanup (AI-typical phrasing and invisible Unicode watermark characters). Use for content-only analysis, not full-page technical checks.
skills/seo-content/SKILL.md
Source commit 6be93f45064ffbadced572b5d5c95f55fd263af0
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 28,177
- Repository last updated
- Nov 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude-code Repository topic
- seo Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- ai-seo Repository topic
- claude-code-skill Repository topic
- marketing-automation Repository topic
- open-source Repository topic
- marketing Derived category
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
LICENSE.txtdoc · 143 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 13,204 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 13,204 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 13,204 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 13,204 bytes
Read excerpt
# Content Quality & E-E-A-T Analysis
## Google's "Who / How / Why" Test (canonical heuristic)
Before scoring E-E-A-T sub-factors, every page audit should pass Google's
own three-question heuristic from the helpful-content guide:
| Question | What to look for |
|---|---|
| **Who** created it? | Visible byline, author bio page, professional credentials. Required where readers expect it; non-negotiable for YMYL. |
| **How** was it created? | Process disclosure where readers would reasonably ask, especially for AI-assisted content. Original research / first-hand evidence / lived experience. |
| **Why** does it exist? | "To help people" rather than "to attract search clicks." Watch for niche entry without expertise, content churn for freshness signals, content written to a word-count target. |
Primary source: