Individual skill
agentsop-bio-fraud-forensics
Screens biomedical / life-science papers for signs of data fabrication, image manipulation, and statistical anomalies, using the detection techniques distilled from the field's canonical exposure platforms (PubPeer, Data Colada, Science Integrity Digest, For Better Science) and tools (ImageTwin/Proofig, statcheck, GRIM/GRIMMER, Problematic Paper Screener, Seek & Blastn). Use when asked to check a paper/figure for image duplication, blot splicing, impossible statistics, paper-mill or tortured-phrase signals, research integrity, or "is this data faked"; or when a user shares a figure, Western blot, supplementary dataset, or DOI and asks whether it looks manipulated. Reports observable anomalies as questions for clarification — it never accuses anyone of fraud.
skills/agentsop-bio-fraud-forensics/SKILL.md
Source commit cf4376869e5f23f82404c3021a2a1315dfca318d
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 469
- Repository last updated
- Nov 8, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skill Repository topic
- skill-creation Repository topic
- ai-agent Repository topic
- llm-agent Repository topic
- skill-engineering Repository topic
- skill-generation Repository topic
- skill-pipeline Repository topic
- skill-construction Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- skill-acquisition Repository topic
- data Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
README.mddoc · 2,955 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,777 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,777 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,777 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,777 bytesUSAGE.mddoc · 8,508 bytesexamples/demo_screening.mddoc · 4,291 bytesreferences/R01-misconduct-taxonomy.mddoc · 20,390 bytesreferences/R02-image-forensics.mddoc · 19,498 bytesreferences/R03-statistical-forensics.mddoc · 19,779 bytesreferences/R04-exposure-sites-method.mddoc · 21,526 bytesreferences/R05-evidence-red-lines.mddoc · 21,908 bytesreferences/R06-screening-workflow.mddoc · 22,217 bytesreferences/R07-paper-mill-signals.mddoc · 19,986 bytesreferences/research_notes.mddoc · 8,099 bytesreferences/sop_models.mddoc · 17,858 bytes
Read excerpt
# Bio-Fraud Forensics · 生物医学论文数据造假筛查
A screening methodology for life-science papers. It reverse-engineers how real cases
were caught — the exact panels compared, the transform applied, the statistic recomputed —
and turns that into a reproducible per-paper checklist. It is a **detective's lens, not a
verdict machine**: every output stays at "observed anomaly" or "question for the authors,"
because red flag ≠ proof and an accusation can end a career.
## Activation Rules
**Trigger when:**
- "Check this paper / figure / Western blot for manipulation," "does this data look faked," "screen for image duplication."
- A user shares a figure, blot, microscopy panel, supplementary `.xlsx`, or a DOI and asks if it's trustworthy.
- "Is this a paper mill?", "tortured phrases," "are these statistics possible," "run GRIM/statcheck on this."