Individual skill
scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation
Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback. Use when evaluating academic or scientific work — papers, proposals, methods sections, or evidence quality — against a repeatable rubric.
skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/SKILL.md
Source commit d2ef2680594f9a17526a6e1a2e18b3d242c5d17b
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 299,933
- Repository last updated
- Nov 6, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- developer-tools Repository topic
- llm Repository topic
- mcp Repository topic
- productivity Repository topic
- research Derived category
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,906 bytes
Read excerpt
# Scholar Evaluation
Use this skill to evaluate academic or scientific work with a repeatable rubric.
## When to Use
- Reviewing a research paper, proposal, thesis chapter, or literature review.
- Checking whether claims are supported by cited evidence.
- Evaluating methodology, study design, analysis, or limitations.
- Comparing two or more papers for quality or relevance.
- Producing structured feedback for revision.
## Evaluation Scope
