EricSanchezok/repo-seed

Read Write Edit Bash

Flags: `--dry-run` (report only), `--no-interview` (non-interactive; preserve user-modified files), `--adopt` (reuse detected governance paths in an unmanaged repository), `--hooks install|skip` (default `skip`), `--values k=v` (repeatable)

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1200 660" role="img" aria-labelledby="title desc">

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1200 470" role="img" aria-labelledby="title desc">

- [ADR 0002](0002-self-governing-repository-design.md) — what the generated baseline contains. - [.repo-seed/update-strategy.md](../../.repo-seed/update-strategy.md) — the ownership/update semantics. - [Vercel: “AGENTS.md outperforms skills

- [Vercel: “AGENTS.md outperforms skills in our agent evals”](https://vercel.com/blog/agents-md-outperforms-skills-in-our-agent-evals) — source for the 56% non-invocation result.

- [ADR 0002](0002-self-governing-repository-design.md) — five-layer governance this extends. - [references/update-strategy.md](../../references/update-strategy.md) — extension preservation semantics. - [Gloaguen et al., “Evaluating AGENTS.m

- [references/update-strategy.md](../../references/update-strategy.md) — extension preservation semantics. - [Gloaguen et al., “Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?”](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602

- [Gloaguen et al., “Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?”](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11988) — evidence for the minimal mandatory instruction layer and inference-cost trade-off.

- [OpenSSF Scorecard checks](https://github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/d1fab88f54636ff366076edfc5c239f97b3c8e66/docs/checks.md) — versioned source for least-privilege workflow tokens and SHA-pinned dependencies.

## Links - [Anthropic, “The AI-Native SDLC playbook”](https://claude.com/blog/the-ai-native-sdlc-playbook) — version-controlled intent/spec/plan artifacts, human approval gates, and continuous evidence inspired the artifact chain; accessed 

- [Anthropic, “The AI-Native SDLC playbook”](https://claude.com/blog/the-ai-native-sdlc-playbook) — version-controlled intent/spec/plan artifacts, human approval gates, and continuous evidence inspired the artifact chain; accessed 2026-08-2

## Links - [Supersedes ADR 0004](0004-optional-extensions-core-minimal.md) — replaces static optional packs as the primary model while retaining its CLI compatibility surface. - [Anthropic, “The AI-Native SDLC playbook”](https://claude.com/

- [Supersedes ADR 0004](0004-optional-extensions-core-minimal.md) — replaces static optional packs as the primary model while retaining its CLI compatibility surface. - [Anthropic, “The AI-Native SDLC playbook”](https://claude.com/blog/the-

- [Anthropic, “The AI-Native SDLC playbook”](https://claude.com/blog/the-ai-native-sdlc-playbook) — modular adoption, skills as institutional knowledge, and explicit legacy-system source-of-truth choices informed the catalog and adoption mo

## Links - [Supersedes ADR 0002](0002-self-governing-repository-design.md) — retains layered governance while replacing duplicated automatic-hook enforcement with capability state and explicit authority. - [Anthropic, “The AI-Native SDLC pl

- [Supersedes ADR 0002](0002-self-governing-repository-design.md) — retains layered governance while replacing duplicated automatic-hook enforcement with capability state and explicit authority. - [Anthropic, “The AI-Native SDLC playbook”](

- [Anthropic, “The AI-Native SDLC playbook”](https://claude.com/blog/the-ai-native-sdlc-playbook) — governance-as-the-agent-acts, continuous evaluation, and human attention at approval gates informed the execution boundary; accessed 2026-08

- [Human-readable implementation guidance Spec](../specs/0003-human-readable-implementation-guidance.md) - [Google: What to look for in a code review](https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/reviewer/looking-for.html)

- [Google: What to look for in a code review](https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/reviewer/looking-for.html)

- [Google: The standard of code review](https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/reviewer/standard.html)

- [Go style decisions: naming](https://google.github.io/styleguide/go/decisions.html#naming)

- [Anthropic engineering code-review skill](https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/main/engineering/skills/code-review/SKILL.md)

- [Agent-oriented clean-code skill surveyed as an alternative](https://github.com/btseee/clean-code-skills/blob/main/skills/clean-code/SKILL.md)

// Source: "Exponential Backoff and Jitter" — https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/exponential-backoff-and-jitter/

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 2.1, available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html.

[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org

- [ADR 0002](0002-self-governing-repository-design.md) — what the generated baseline contains. - [.repo-seed/update-strategy.md](../../.repo-seed/update-strategy.md) — the ownership/update semantics. - [Vercel: “AGENTS.md outperforms skills

- [Vercel: “AGENTS.md outperforms skills in our agent evals”](https://vercel.com/blog/agents-md-outperforms-skills-in-our-agent-evals) — source for the 56% non-invocation result.

```text // Source: "Exponential Backoff and Jitter" — https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/exponential-backoff-and-jitter/

// Source: "Exponential Backoff and Jitter" — https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/exponential-backoff-and-jitter/

#!/usr/bin/env node

[Credential-related source omitted]

#!/usr/bin/env node

#!/usr/bin/env node

Executable file

[Credential-related source omitted]

try {     await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: root });     await execFileAsync('git', ['remote', 'add', 'origin', 'https://github.com/example/project.git'], { cwd: root });

await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: root });     await execFileAsync('git', ['remote', 'add', 'origin', 'https://github.com/example/project.git'], { cwd: root });     await writeFile(path.join(root, 'package.json'), JSON.stringify({

await execFileAsync('git', ['remote', 'add', 'origin', 'https://github.com/example/project.git'], { cwd: root });

'--templates', TEMPLATES,       '--no-interview',       '--external-source', 'decisions=https://example.com/decisions/ABC-1',

'--no-interview',       '--external-source', 'decisions=https://example.com/decisions/ABC-1',       '--external-source', 'specs=https://example.com/requirements/REQ-7',

'--external-source', 'decisions=https://example.com/decisions/ABC-1',

'--external-source', 'specs=https://example.com/requirements/REQ-7',

'--external-source', 'postmortems=https://example.com/incidents/INC-3',

#!/usr/bin/env node

#!/usr/bin/env node

#!/usr/bin/env node

const targetDir = args[0];   if (!targetDir) {     console.error('usage: scaffold.mjs <target-dir> [--templates <dir>] [--dry-run] [--no-interview] [--record-only] [--adopt] [--hooks install|skip] [--values k=v] [--extensions ci,release] [-

if (!targetDir) {     console.error('usage: scaffold.mjs <target-dir> [--templates <dir>] [--dry-run] [--no-interview] [--record-only] [--adopt] [--hooks install|skip] [--values k=v] [--extensions ci,release] [--capability-state id=state] [

console.error('usage: scaffold.mjs <target-dir> [--templates <dir>] [--dry-run] [--no-interview] [--record-only] [--adopt] [--hooks install|skip] [--values k=v] [--extensions ci,release] [--capability-state id=state] [--governance-path kind

Executable file

#!/usr/bin/env node

#!/usr/bin/env node

Executable file

import { mkdtemp, mkdir, writeFile, rm } from 'node:fs/promises';

#!/usr/bin/env node

#!/usr/bin/env node

#!/usr/bin/env node

#!/usr/bin/env node

#!/usr/bin/env node