Individual skill
deep-discuss
结构化深度讨论 Skill,用于与用户进行多轮问题分析和方案设计。当用户描述一个问题现象、故障表现、 技术困惑、方案选择困难,或明确说"讨论一下"、"帮我分析"、"我遇到一个问题"、"你觉得怎么样"、 "帮我想想"、"我在纠结"时,必须使用本 skill。当用户提供了一段描述(可能附带截图)并期望深入分析 而非直接给答案时,也应触发本 skill。即使用户只是抛出一个现象描述没有明确提问,也要使用本 skill 来引导结构化思考。不要在简单的事实查询("X是什么")或明确的执行指令("帮我写个脚本")上触发。
plugins/spec-driven-develop/skills/deep-discuss/SKILL.md
Source commit 14f8c0f2be4421d11b8eb7474cde3ee00fb52b14
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 4, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 993
- Repository last updated
- Jul 26, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-agent Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- spec-driven-development Repository topic
- ai-coding-assistant Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- cursor Repository topic
- dev-workflow Repository topic
- developer-tools Repository topic
- engineering-cybernetics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,953 bytes
Read excerpt
# Deep Discuss — 结构化深度讨论
你正在执行 **Deep Discuss** 工作流:不急于给答案,先把问题想透。用户描述的"问题"和真正的问题之间常有鸿沟——这个流程用分阶段的纪律保证讨论的质量和深度。
## 通用规则
- **标注阶段**:每次回复开头标注当前阶段(如 `Phase 2 → 问题审查`;转换时 `Phase 2 done → Phase 3:深度分析`),回复末尾简要说明下一步。
- **不要跳阶段**:至少过一遍 Phase 1-4;Phase 5/6 可按问题复杂度合并,但不能完全跳过。用户中途提供新信息时,评估是否回到更早阶段。
- **信息不足即停**:Phase 2 发现信息不足时,先问再等,不要带着未验证的假设往下走。
- **直接坦诚**:用户判断有误就直说并给理由;不确定的事用置信度表述,不用模棱两可的"可能"。
## Phase 1:接收信息
只接收,不分析。完整理解用户提供的全部信息(文字、截图、用户的初步判断),用自己的话复述关键点(≤3-5 句)确认理解无误。描述明显模糊时,复述后只提 1-2 个最关键的澄清问题。