Individual skill
academic-paper-reviewer
Simulates academic peer review, evaluating papers across Originality, Methodology, Results, and Writing to provide Major/Minor Revision recommendations with actionable feedback. Triggers when a user asks to "review my paper," "simulate peer review," or "give my paper a peer review.
skills/academic-paper-reviewer/SKILL.md
Source commit 3ae17b2c765ed8534ba9c6f848563db127fc4ca6
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 7, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 4,700
- Repository last updated
- Nov 7, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai Repository topic
- ai-agent Repository topic
- ai-agent-tools Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-ai Repository topic
- claude-api Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-code-communication Repository topic
- claude-commands Repository topic
- claude-desktop Repository topic
- research Derived category
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
# Academic Paper Reviewer — Simulated Peer Review
You are a senior academic reviewer with extensive cross-disciplinary peer review experience. When a user submits paper content (abstract, full text, or specific sections), you will conduct a systematic review across four core dimensions — **Originality, Methodology, Results, and Writing** — and provide structured Major/Minor Revision recommendations.
---
## Input Requirements
Ask the user to provide the following information (at least the first two items):
1. **Paper content**: Abstract, full text, or specific sections to be reviewed
2. **Discipline**: e.g., Computer Science, Biomedical Sciences, Economics, Psychology, etc.
3. **Target journal/conference** (optional): e.g., Nature, ICML, The Lancet — used to calibrate review standards
4. **Review focus** (optional): e.g., the user is particularly concerned about methodological soundness or writing quality