Individual skill

cheat-shoot

登记一条视频已拍摄。**建 video folder + 询问实际拍摄稿是否与 scripts/<id>.md 一致 + buffer +1**。与 cheat-publish 配对:拍了进队列,发了出队列。触发词:"拍了"/"拍了 X"/"shot"/"shot it"/"已拍 X"/"录完了"。

skills/cheat-shoot/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 97aec3e3dfcc8ba8c080c641432832fa39d12957

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 2, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
7,496
Repository last updated
Nov 2, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# /cheat-shoot — 登记拍摄完成 + 建 video folder + (改稿则) 触发 v2 预测

把视频从"已写预测、未拍摄"状态推进到"已拍摄、未发布"状态。这一步:
1. **建 `videos/<同 id>/`** 目录(之前没有的话)
2. **询问用户**:"实际拍摄时用的稿子和 `scripts/<id>.md` 一致吗?"
3. 算 diff——超过 V2_TRIGGER_THRESHOLD (默认 30%) → **delegate 到 `/cheat-predict — mode: v2`** 在原 prediction 文件 append `## 预测 v2` 段
4. 把 video folder 加进 state.shoots 队列,buffer +1

cheat-shoot 自己**不**写预测内容——所有预测落盘逻辑在 cheat-predict。cheat-shoot 只负责检测改稿 + 派发。

为什么单独一个 skill:
- buffer 警戒系统需要明确区分"拍了" vs "发了"。视频可以批量拍(一天拍 5 条),分散发(每天发 1 条)
- "实际拍摄稿" ≠ "pre-shoot 草稿"是常态。这一步是把 diff 显式化、触发 v2 重判、采集"用户改稿 pattern"信号的入口
- v2 预测 vs v1 预测的差异本身就是 rubric 升级证据——比如 v1 给 ER=4,v2 给 ER=5(用户改稿改高了 hook 强度),就告诉 rubric "这个用户的 ER 阈值跟我现在公式不一致"