Individual skill

performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack

Execute HTTP Parameter Pollution attacks to bypass input validation, WAF rules, and security controls by injecting duplicate parameters that are processed differently by front-end and back-end systems.

internal/tools/skills/data/web-application-security/performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d42f381ad34843e71a42658e5c57290c713e85af

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 7, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,309
Repository last updated
Nov 5, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Performing HTTP Parameter Pollution Attack

## When to Use
- When testing web applications for input validation bypass vulnerabilities
- During WAF evasion testing to split attack payloads across duplicate parameters
- When assessing how different technology stacks handle duplicate HTTP parameters
- During API security testing to identify parameter precedence issues
- When testing OAuth or payment processing flows for parameter manipulation

### How to CONFIRM a Hit (avoid false negatives)
- The positive signal is a **security-relevant behavioural change driven by which duplicate wins**: sending `param=A&param=B` produces an outcome that neither `param=A` nor `param=B` alone produces, OR the value the back-end acts on differs from the value the front-end/WAF inspected (price, role, redirect_uri, account). A 200 is not proof — you must show the differential.
- First map precedence empirically, do not assume: send `q=first&q=second` and read the response to learn whether the stack takes first, last, all-concatenated (comma), or an array. The bug exists when the WAF/validator reads one copy and the business logic reads the other.
- Confirm WAF-split bypasses by proving the reassembled payload executed (e.g. SQLi/XSS effect appears) while each half alone is blocked/inert — splitting that yields nothing is not a finding.
- Do NOT conclude negative until you have tried ALL of these: