Individual skill
response-to-reviewers
Write effective point-by-point responses to peer reviewer comments for revisions
skills/writing/composition/response-to-reviewers/SKILL.md
Source commit bf44b3cd617fa94c8a1b254c5d1987142ca3d631
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 5, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 310
- Repository last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
# Response to Reviewers Guide
A skill for crafting professional, thorough responses to peer reviewer comments during manuscript revision. Covers structure, tone, strategies for handling difficult comments, and templates for common revision scenarios.
## Response Document Structure
### Standard Format
```
Dear Editor,
Thank you for the opportunity to revise our manuscript entitled "[Title]"
(Manuscript ID: [ID]). We appreciate the constructive feedback from the
reviewers and have carefully addressed all comments. Below, we provide