Individual skill
literature-review
Finds, ranks and reads the literature on a question, the retrieval loop the lead runs itself over OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed and bioRxiv with a fixed budget, deduplication, ranking by topical fit, reading of the load-bearing papers and claim-level links, for related-work sections, prior-art checks, surveys and systematic reviews. Use for "find papers", "what is known about", related work, or a review; escalate to PRISMA screening only when a systematic review is requested. For one quick fact or definition use research-lookup.
backend/cli/skills/core/literature-review/SKILL.md
Source commit a08e0ad0ad3d6448123039ee4659163eb2e35d99
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 2, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 4,355
- Repository last updated
- Nov 7, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,449 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 7,449 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 7,449 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 7,449 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 7,449 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 7,449 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 7,449 bytesreferences/database-strategies.mddoc · 15,781 bytesreferences/search-strategies.mddoc · 20,758 bytes
Read excerpt
# Literature review
You are the retrieval ranker. Run the searches, look at every candidate, decide what is
worth reading, and read it before it becomes a claim. Never hand the loop to a worker: the
ranking is the judgement, and a worker without the conversation ranks for a different
question.
## Non-negotiables
1. **One window, one priority, fixed before the first query.** Recency, historical or
default; a date bound only if the question has one. Never widen the window mid-loop to
find "the famous paper" the user excluded.
2. **Budget by difficulty.** Rate the question 1–10. Difficulty 1–3 gets the initial round
only; 4–7 gets one follow-up round; 8–10 gets two. A round targets one concrete gap