Individual skill
spec-kitty-mission-review
Review a fully merged Spec Kitty mission post-merge (all WPs done/approved) to verify spec→code fidelity, FR coverage, drift, risks, and security. Triggers: "review the merged mission", "post-merge mission review", "verify the completed mission", "audit the mission implementation", "mission-level acceptance review", "is this mission releasable", "final review before tagging", "cross-WP coverage audit". Does NOT handle: per-WP review during implementation (use spec-kitty-runtime-review), implement-review loop orchestration (use spec-kitty-implement-review), setup or repair (use spec-kitty-setup-doctor), or glossary maintenance (use spk-charter-glossary).
src/charter/offering/skills/spec-kitty-mission-review/SKILL.md
Source commit 25b7cd4fbc8f42ec71219408e2b5d76e7dae38b4
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,717
- Repository last updated
- Nov 7, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude-code Repository topic
- gemini-cli Repository topic
- spec-driven-development Repository topic
- cursor-agent Repository topic
- github-copilot Repository topic
- windsurf Repository topic
- ai-coding-workflow Repository topic
- ai-development-dashboard Repository topic
- ai-progress-tracking Repository topic
- coding-agent-orchestration Repository topic
- security Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 37,837 bytesreferences/mission-review-fr-trace-guide.mddoc · 9,855 bytes
Read excerpt
# spec-kitty-mission-review
You are the expert senior reviewer for a completed Spec Kitty mission. The
mission has been fully implemented, all WPs have been approved, and the feature
branch has been merged. Your job is to answer a single question with documented
evidence: **does the merged code accurately and completely realize the spec, and
are there risks the implementation team did not surface?**
This is not a checklist exercise. It is structured adversarial analysis. You
read the spec as the author's promise and the code as the executor's delivery,
and you measure the gap. Every finding you produce must be traceable to an
artifact (a spec section, a git diff line, a test file, a contract clause). You
do not fix anything. You document.