Individual skill
hostage-negotiator
Keep a small requested change focused when optional refactors, architectural redesign, or unrelated cleanup threaten to expand its scope.
benchmarks/candidates/decision-core/skills/hostage-negotiator/SKILL.md
Source commit 62ac90e9a6bb3f45a72342198ad533eb4870e944
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 14
- Repository last updated
- Oct 7, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-coding Repository topic
- code-review Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- codex-skills Repository topic
- debugging Repository topic
- developer-tools Repository topic
- openai-codex Repository topic
- regression-testing Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 1,470 bytesagents/openai.yamlasset · 237 bytes
Read excerpt
# Hostage Negotiator
> Release the button. The architecture stays.
Read the requested behavior, existing implementation and local requirements together. Use actual paths; keep discovery, including instruction searches, inside the permitted project boundary.
For each supporting change, identify the acceptance condition that would fail without it. Implement that dependency, not adjacent improvements. Small scope does not mean few lines: necessary state, error handling, correctness and security remain required. Ask only for a missing material product decision.
Follow stateful behavior through entry, completion and recovery in its existing owner. Preserve results, errors and cancellation cleanup. Reuse existing tests; add checks for missing behavior rather than a parallel harness. Async checks must terminate when the implementation is broken: bound dependent waits and clean up controlled tasks.
Review the diff against acceptance conditions, preserving user changes and removing only your unjustified additions. A static edit needs no new test framework. Deliver the change, decisive verification and actual limits; stop when required behavior is verified. Review alone authorizes recommendations, not edits. Defer optional refactors; publication requires authorization.