Individual skill
integration-orchestrator
Generate a phased delivery orchestration plan for creative-direction-driven work: which skills run when, what locks at which gate, how handoffs occur, and how the cadence implements in the team's tools (Jira, Linear, Notion, Figma, GitHub) with AI agents via MCP and CLI. A temporal map of phases, lock points, handoff specs, gate definitions, and QA verification gates. Distinct from `creative-brief` (static project brief) and `creative-direction` (aesthetic direction). Triggers on integration orchestrator, delivery cadence, project orchestration, when does the brief lock, how to phase creative direction, design-development handoff, QA gate, agent-driven QA, and when a creative-direction project is starting, mid-flight with broken cadence, or integrating AI agents into PM workflow. Does NOT fire for project scoping (use `creative-brief`), aesthetic direction (use `creative-direction`), or general project management without a creative-direction throughline.
dist/codex/.agents/skills/integration-orchestrator/SKILL.md
Source commit 9b90db257f7395fab76ff9bfcb808456709f6af3
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 4, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,043
- Repository last updated
- Oct 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- mcp Repository topic
- seo Repository topic
- web-development Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- product-management Repository topic
- web-design Repository topic
- design Derived category
- operations Derived category
- productivity Derived category
- design-interface Derived category
- productivity-notes Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 20,869 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 20,869 bytesreferences/_claude-frontmatter-extras.yamlasset · 423 bytesreferences/automation-and-qa-tooling.mddoc · 12,839 bytesreferences/cadence-patterns.mddoc · 11,589 bytesreferences/example-orchestration.mddoc · 15,949 bytesreferences/gate-definitions.mddoc · 9,868 bytesreferences/handoff-protocols.mddoc · 12,110 bytesreferences/platform-implementation.mddoc · 17,271 bytesreferences/team-size-modulation.mddoc · 7,938 bytes
Read excerpt
# Integration Orchestrator
A brief tells a team what to make. Creative direction tells them what it should feel like. Neither tells them when each decision locks, who reviews what, or what stops the next phase from starting before the prior one is done. That is the gap this skill fills.
The output is a phased orchestration plan the PM can paste into a calendar Monday morning and start running Tuesday. Phases, gates, lock points, handoffs, QA verification rules, and a platform-specific implementation guide for whatever stack the team actually uses (Jira, Linear, Notion, Figma, GitHub, agile sprints).
---
## What this skill is
A creative-direction project has three layers. The brief layer defines scope, audience, deliverables, constraints, success criteria. The direction layer defines tone, aesthetic, relationship, and sensory ambition. Both produce written artifacts. Neither answers the temporal question: when does the brief lock, when does identity lock, when does copy lock, who reviews each, what gets blocked while a gate is open, what happens when a downstream task discovers the brief is wrong, and what makes "Done" mean tested rather than self-reported.
This skill produces that temporal layer. Most teams have briefs and creative direction but no orchestration plan. The result, by week 3, is everyone working in parallel with no shared sense of which decisions are still open and which are locked. Brief drift. Re-work. Identity tokens shifted after copy was already drafted against the old ones. Engineering shipping before design had a chance to review. "Done" tickets that were never actually verified.