Individual skill
quiz-and-assessment-design
Designing quizzes, personality assessments, and recommendation tools that segment users into actionable categories rather than generating clicks for clicks' sake. Question architecture, scoring algorithms, result categorization, recommendation mapping, lead capture integration. Honest about clickbait-quiz (engagement only), vanity-result (entertaining, not useful), and actionable-segmentation (genuine categorization that drives next-step recommendations) patterns. Triggers on quiz, assessment, personality test, recommendation tool, scorecard, diagnostic, fit evaluator, what-type-of-X-are-you, persona quiz. Also triggers when an audience needs a categorization-driven lead magnet, when a vanity quiz is producing engagement but no qualified leads, or when an assessment is being scoped for the first time.
dist/pi/.agents/skills/quiz-and-assessment-design/SKILL.md
Source commit 9b90db257f7395fab76ff9bfcb808456709f6af3
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 4, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,047
- Repository last updated
- Oct 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- mcp Repository topic
- seo Repository topic
- web-development Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- product-management Repository topic
- web-design Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
- design Derived category
- testing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 21,637 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 21,637 bytesreferences/clickbait-vs-actionable-distinctions.mddoc · 10,891 bytesreferences/common-quiz-failures.mddoc · 9,721 bytesreferences/lead-capture-integration-patterns.mddoc · 10,098 bytesreferences/question-architecture-patterns.mddoc · 10,502 bytesreferences/quiz-anti-patterns.mddoc · 10,555 bytesreferences/quiz-investment-criteria.mddoc · 9,217 bytesreferences/result-categorization-patterns.mddoc · 10,462 bytesreferences/result-to-recommendation-mapping.mddoc · 11,699 bytesreferences/scoring-algorithm-patterns.mddoc · 11,391 bytes
Read excerpt
# Quiz and Assessment Design
A senior growth practitioner's playbook for designing quizzes and assessments that produce actionable segmentation rather than generating clicks for clicks' sake. Question architecture, scoring algorithms, result categorization, recommendation mapping. The discipline of building a quiz the audience actually uses to make a decision.
Most quizzes on the web are clickbait. "What kind of pizza are you?" energy applied to brand-building, with results that flatter the taker but drive no specific next step. The quiz captures emails because the format implies fun; the leads are unqualified because the result told them nothing they could act on.
The quizzes that work as compounding assets do something different. They categorize the taker into a defined segment with a specific recommendation matched to that segment. The taker comes away knowing what to do next, not just what they are. The brand becomes the source of the recommendation the audience acted on.
This skill is one of the specific lead-magnet types covered as its own skill. The parent-frame methodology lives in `lead-magnet-design`; the quiz-specific methodology (scoring algorithms, result categorization, recommendation matching) lives here.
The voice is the senior growth practitioner who has watched quizzes earn long-term subscribers and watched them produce engagement metrics with no downstream impact. Practical, opinionated about the difference between fun-quiz and decision-quiz, willing to call out when a quiz is the wrong format for the goal.
When to use this skill: scoping a quiz or assessment for the first time, auditing a quiz that produces engagement but no qualified leads, designing the result categories that drive specific recommendations, or deciding which inputs warrant the lead-capture step.