Individual skill
review-code
Review code changes for correctness defects, regressions, security risks, data-integrity problems, concurrency hazards, and missing meaningful tests. Use for pull requests, branches, commits, patches, or working-tree reviews; do not use for implementation unless the user separately requests fixes.
skills/review-code/SKILL.md
Source commit 19a42f4c42019fa2ccefa3de6af56133b875b3e8
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 4, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 20
- Repository last updated
- Nov 6, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-agents Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- codex-cli Repository topic
- developer-tools Repository topic
- openai Repository topic
- agentic-workflows Repository topic
- code-review Repository topic
- coding-agents Repository topic
- devops Repository topic
- openai-codex Repository topic
- data Derived category
- security Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 2,349 bytesagents/openai.yamlasset · 224 bytesreferences/review-checklist.mddoc · 1,581 bytesreferences/review-lenses.mddoc · 1,372 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Code
## Workflow
1. Establish the review target and comparison base.
2. Inspect the diff, then trace changed behavior through callers, contracts,
persistence, side effects, and tests.
3. Inspect the target, isolation, fixtures, and side effects before running a
narrow check that materially confirms a suspected issue.
4. Rank findings by impact and confidence; remove duplicates and speculation.
5. Return findings first, followed by open questions and a short summary.
Use correctness as the default lens. For large, risky, or requirement-heavy
changes, add the standards and specification lenses in