Individual skill
oh-story-review
对网络小说大纲、章节或短篇成稿做证据化商业审稿,按事实连续性、因果、人物选择、读者契约、节奏、信息、对话和表达分级问题。用于章节验收、整稿诊断、投稿前审查或生成优先修订清单。
presets/openwrite/skills/oh-story-review/SKILL.md
Source commit 49c77e604a0f7aa33191e6719c46a5d58469fe1b
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 8, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 934
- Repository last updated
- Nov 7, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- story-writing Repository topic
- writing-assistant Repository topic
- ai-novel Repository topic
- dsh-plugin Repository topic
- deepseek-harness Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
LICENSEasset · 1,081 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 2,096 bytesagents/openai.yamlasset · 264 bytesreferences/method.mddoc · 1,665 bytes
Read excerpt
Language: follow the author's current conversation language for responses and help; preserve the manuscript language. Translate these instructions when presenting them.
# Oh Story 商业审稿
先确认审查对象、范围、目标读者和用户要“只诊断”还是“诊断后给修改稿”。默认只输出审查报告,不直接改动正文。
## 执行流程
1. 读取当前项目已确认资产、相关正文和审稿范围,先做缺失资料与冲突预检。
2. 使用 `references/method.md` 按阻断、严重、一般、润色四级检查,不让文风偏好掩盖事实或结构问题。
3. 每条发现给出位置或引文、问题、读者影响、证据和最小修复方向;证据不足时标记“需补充”。
4. 汇总最高优先级问题、可保留优点、建议修订顺序和仍需作者裁定的取舍。
5. 只有用户明确要求修改时才生成候选稿;涉及正式正文提交时继续走 OpenWrite workflow。