Menu

Individual skill

adversarial-review

0upvotes

开发完成后的三方对抗式代码评审闭环：蓝军（敌意审查，须给证据链）→ 第三方（独立审计，不信双方文档、只读代码，专找"修改引入的新缺陷"并稽核蓝军漏审的维度）→ 中立裁定（逐条采纳/驳回、审查双方共同前提）。当用户说"蓝军评审""第三方复核""对抗性审查""红蓝互搏""三方评审""交叉验证""发布前审查""帮我挑刺""adversarial review""red team review""pre-release review""critique this""find bugs in my code"或要求提升代码质量、准备发布前把关时使用。也适用于用户想把当前会话变成"多个 Agent 互搏"来提升代码水平的场景。

builtin-skills/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 32f4c02677151dc23f6d1cfe1616b04ed8918b26

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 4, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
5,375
Repository last updated
Nov 6, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# 三方对抗式代码评审（Blue Team / Third Party / Adjudication）

## 这个 skill 要解决什么

单人或单 AI 写代码，最大的风险不是"不会写"，而是：

1. **用未验证的乐观假设说服自己推迟修复**（"这个兜底应该够了吧"）；
2. **测试提供假安全感**（测试全绿，但功能其实早坏了）；
3. **为了修 A 而引入 B**（新写的修复代码本身没被独立审视）。

这三个问题**靠"再仔细看一遍"解决不了**——写代码的人和审代码的人是同一个，就一定会为自己辩护。只能靠**结构化的对抗关系**：

| 角色 | 立场 | 硬性约束 |
|---|---|---|