Menu

Individual skill

review

Run a standard Claude Code review of local git changes in this repository. Args: --wait, --background, --base <ref>, --scope <auto|working-tree|branch>, --model <model>, --effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>. Defaults to opus with no forced effort. Use as the default path for ordinary code-review requests when the user did not explicitly ask for stronger adversarial scrutiny or for Claude to own the implementation work.

plugins/sendbird/cc-plugin-codex/skills/review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d780783eba4ecc7c8b9429f95c9362df95f07c61

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 4, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,532
Repository last updated
Nov 6, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Claude Code Review

Use this skill when the user wants Claude Code to review the current working tree or a branch diff in this repository.

Use `$cc:review` as the default when the user asks for code review, asks you to have Claude review something, or wants a second review pass without explicitly asking for stronger adversarial scrutiny.
If the user asks for stronger challenge on design, tradeoffs, rollout risk, migration risk, configuration behavior, or provides custom review focus text, route to `$cc:adversarial-review` instead.
If the user wants Claude Code to investigate, validate by changing code, or actually fix/implement something, route to `$cc:rescue` instead.
If the overall request is "you review it too, also ask Claude to review in the background, then you aggregate and fix it", keep the delegated Claude part on `$cc:review` unless the user explicitly asks for a harsher or more adversarial review.
`$cc:review` does not accept custom focus text. If the user wants to steer Claude toward a particular angle, question, subsystem, or risk area, that is a signal to use `$cc:adversarial-review` instead.

Resolve `<plugin-root>` as two directories above this `SKILL.md` file. Always run the companion from that active plugin root:
`node "<plugin-root>/scripts/claude-companion.mjs" review ...`

Supported arguments: `--wait`, `--background`, `--base <ref>`, `--scope auto|working-tree|branch`, `--model <model>`, `--effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>` (defaults: model=opus and no effort; `fable`, `opus`, `sonnet`, and `haiku` each keep Claude Code's own effort default, and Claude Code owns which effort levels each model supports)