Individual skill
principle-encode-lessons-in-structure
Use when you catch yourself repeating an instruction or the user corrects the same thing again. Convert the lesson into a check that breaks on violation (a lint rule, type, runtime assertion, or script) in place of more prose.
plugins/requie/endostack/skills/principle-encode-lessons-in-structure/SKILL.md
Source commit d780783eba4ecc7c8b9429f95c9362df95f07c61
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 4, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,531
- Repository last updated
- Nov 6, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-coding Repository topic
- awesome Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- codex-plugins Repository topic
- openai Repository topic
- codex-skill Repository topic
- codex-skills Repository topic
- marketplace Repository topic
- codex-marketplace Repository topic
- education Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 2,506 bytes
Read excerpt
# Encode lessons in structure
A lesson that keeps coming back should be enforced by a mechanism that fails loudly when broken: a lint rule, a type, a metadata flag, a runtime check, or a script. Writing one more paragraph into an instruction file is what you do only when nothing else works.
## When it applies
You notice you are writing an instruction for the second time, or the user keeps issuing the same correction. A one-off correction that has not recurred does not qualify.
## What to do
1. Ask whether the lesson can be checked mechanically. If it can, encode it. "Never log the `Authorization` header" becomes a logger serializer that redacts the header plus a test that fails if the raw value appears in output. "Don't call `subprocess` with `shell=True`" becomes a lint rule in CI.
2. When the lesson depends on judgment that no check can capture, leave it as text. Move it somewhere more visible and pair it with a concrete example of the failure, so readers see what goes wrong.
3. Once a structural fix exists, delete the duplicate instruction. The repetition was a symptom of the missing structure, and keeping both means two sources of truth that will drift.