Individual skill

ockhams-equivalent-designs

Identify when two design options are functionally equivalent so the razor can be applied. Use when comparing design alternatives, evaluating whether two implementations of a feature actually produce the same outcome, or recognizing that a complex solution doesn't earn its place against a simpler one. Most design debates involve actual tradeoffs; the razor only cuts when the alternatives genuinely produce equivalent results. The skill is identifying equivalence honestly rather than rationalizing complexity.

plugins/HDeibler/universal-design-principles/plugins/process-and-robustness-principles/skills/ockhams-equivalent-designs/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d780783eba4ecc7c8b9429f95c9362df95f07c61

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 4, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,530
Repository last updated
Nov 6, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Ockham's Razor — equivalent designs

The razor cuts when alternatives are functionally equivalent. The skill is recognizing when alternatives actually are equivalent — versus when a more complex alternative serves a real need that the simpler one doesn't.

Designers and engineers often defend complexity by imagining benefits the complex solution provides. Sometimes those benefits are real; sometimes they're rationalization. The discipline is honest evaluation of whether the complexity earns its place.

## Defining functional equivalence

Two designs are functionally equivalent when they produce the same outcome for users. Specifically:

**Same goal achieved.** The user can accomplish what they're trying to accomplish.

**Same quality of outcome.** The result is equally good (correct, complete, accurate).