Individual skill
owner-intent-audit
Check agent-produced plans, tests, or code against the owner's actual intent. Find missing meaning, unrequested work, stale truth, unreachable decisions, unsupported completion claims, and implementation debt. Use before approval or merge.
plugins/sno-ai/sno-station-skills/skills/owner-intent-audit/SKILL.md
Source commit d780783eba4ecc7c8b9429f95c9362df95f07c61
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 4, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,533
- Repository last updated
- Nov 6, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-coding Repository topic
- awesome Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- codex-plugins Repository topic
- openai Repository topic
- codex-skill Repository topic
- codex-skills Repository topic
- marketplace Repository topic
- codex-marketplace Repository topic
- security Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,965 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 6,965 bytesscripts/selftest/run-selftest.shruns · 154 bytesscripts/selftest/verify-review-boundary.shruns · 920 bytes
Read excerpt
# Owner Intent Audit
The question this review answers is not "is the artifact good" but **"is this what the owner
meant, and what did the agent leave behind while making it?"** (The owner is whoever owns the
work and decides what it should be; often that is the user.) An agent can produce a PRD (product
requirements document), a plan, or a diff that is locally excellent and still specify a different product, carry work
nobody asked for, or hide the debts agents characteristically create. Reviewing the artifact
for its own defects — bugs, security holes, silent death — is peer-review's job, not this one;
the two are run separately and neither substitutes for the other.
- **Plan mode:** PRDs, designs, specs, task lists, refactor plans, and test plans.
- **Code mode:** diffs, files, tests, or subsystems substantially written by agents.
Start with the ordinary user and system flow. Realistic common-path failure outranks exotic