Menu

Individual skill

adversarial-review

Run a design-challenging Claude Code review of local git changes in this repository. Args: --wait, --background, --base <ref>, --scope <auto|working-tree|branch>, --model <model>, --effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>, [focus text]. Defaults to opus with no forced effort. Use only when the user wants stronger scrutiny than a normal review, such as explicit tradeoff challenge, risky-change review, or custom focus text.

plugins/sendbird/cc-plugin-codex/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d780783eba4ecc7c8b9429f95c9362df95f07c61

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 4, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,533
Repository last updated
Nov 7, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Claude Code Adversarial Review

Use this skill when the user wants Claude Code to challenge the implementation approach, design choices, assumptions, or tradeoffs in this repository.

Do not treat `$cc:adversarial-review` as the default review path. Use it only when the user explicitly wants stronger scrutiny than a normal code review.
Good triggers include requests to challenge the design, challenge tradeoffs, pressure-test a risky change, question whether a migration/config/template change really removed the risk, or honor custom focus text that asks for harsher review.
If the user wants Claude Code to go beyond review and perform investigation, validation edits, or implementation work, route to `$cc:rescue` instead.
If the user asks for a local review plus a separate Claude background review and then wants the main Codex thread to aggregate the findings and apply fixes, keep the delegated Claude portion on `$cc:review` unless the user explicitly asks for the adversarial angle.
Unlike `$cc:review`, this skill accepts custom focus text after the flags. The moment the user wants to steer Claude toward a specific angle or risk question, prefer `$cc:adversarial-review`.

Resolve `<plugin-root>` as two directories above this `SKILL.md` file. Always run the companion from that active plugin root:
`node "<plugin-root>/scripts/claude-companion.mjs" adversarial-review ...`

Supported arguments: `--wait`, `--background`, `--base <ref>`, `--scope auto|working-tree|branch`, `--model <model>`, `--effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>`, plus optional focus text after the flags (defaults: model=opus and no effort; `fable`, `opus`, `sonnet`, and `haiku` each keep Claude Code's own effort default, and Claude Code owns which effort levels each model supports)