linkedin-content

• SKILL.mdcore · 16,112 bytes
• evals/README.mddoc · 950 bytes
• evals/cases.yamlasset · 4,060 bytes
• references/hooks-and-formats.mddoc · 5,423 bytes
• scripts/verify.shruns · 5,966 bytes

# LinkedIn Content — The Words a Human Pastes Into the Feed

*You write the copy of one LinkedIn post.* You take a raw idea, a story, or an asset and turn it into finished text the user pastes straight into the composer. You do not pick the topic or the day, you do not design the carousel pixels, you do not write DMs, and you do not call the API. You hand over words.

**The one rule that governs every line: the 2026 algorithm pays for dwell time and comments, not likes or clicks.** That dwell drives ranking is not a marketing claim — LinkedIn's own engineering team documents it: they train a "Long Dwell" classifier and feed per-post dwell into the ranking model precisely because dwell captures the passive readers that likes miss (LinkedIn Engineering, "Leveraging Dwell Time to Improve Member Experiences on the LinkedIn Feed", Oct 2024 — [S1]). The *size* of the gap is reported by practitioner analyses, not LinkedIn: posts with 0–3s dwell are reported to average ~1.2% engagement vs. ~15.6% at 61+s, a ~13x gap ([S2], corroborated by [S3]). Treat the mechanism as solid and the multiplier as directional. A 30-second read beats 50 quick likes. So every line you write has exactly one job: earn the next line, or earn the comment. If a sentence does neither, cut it. *Why: dwell is the currency, and a line that doesn't pull the eye downward stops the clock.*

## Sources — what backs the numbers (and how hard)

Every figure below is keyed inline as `[S#]`. One primary source ([S1]) underpins the *mechanism*; the multipliers come from practitioner analyses and one named industry report, treated as directional, not gospel. All accessed 2026-06-02.

- **[S1] — primary, authoritative.** LinkedIn Engineering, "Leveraging Dwell Time to Improve Member Experiences on the LinkedIn Feed" (Oct 2024): `https://www.linkedin.com/blog/engineering/feed/leveraging-dwell-time-to-improve-member-experiences-on-the-linkedin-feed`. LinkedIn's own write-up of the Long-Dwell classifier and dwell-aware ranking. Backs *that dwell ranks* and *documents outdwell text* — NOT the exact 13x/15x multipliers.
- **[S2] — practitioner analysis.** dataslayer.ai, "LinkedIn Algorithm 2026: What Works Now (Documents, Newsletters, Video)": `https://www.dataslayer.ai/blog/linkedin-algorithm-february-2026-whats-working-now`. Backs the ~60% body-link reach hit, the first-comment-penalty claim, the ~2–5% golden-hour test sample, the ~5% recovery rate, and the sub-60s video figure.
- **[S3] — practitioner analysis, second source.** meet-lea.com, "LinkedIn Algorithm Explained 2026: Dwell Time, Comments & Reach": `https://meet-lea.com/en/blog/linkedin-algorithm-explained`. Independently states the 1.2% vs. 15.6% dwell figures and the ~15x comment weight — and flags the ~15x as an industry estimate with AuthoredUp's quality-aware ~2x as the conservative alternative.
- **[S4] — named industry research report.** Richard van der Blom, "LinkedIn Algorithm Insights Report 2026" (large-scale study, ~400k profiles): `https://richardvanderblom.com/`. Corroborates the dwell-over-likes weighting, the in-body-link reach loss (~18.8% median for one link), and the link-in-first-comment suppression as of early 2026.