Individual skill

course-storytelling

Use when lesson or course content is correct but forgettable and a concept has to LAND: profiles the learner, breaks the blocking false belief, then rebuilds it as epiphany story → named model → grounded analogy → proof → so-what. NOT outcomes, assessment or module order (that is `course-builder`), NOT slide visuals (that is `presentations`).

skills/course-storytelling/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d9d6bb338f66cc1e23998585e580a0ea45bbcb82

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 6, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
544
Repository last updated
Nov 4, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Course Storytelling — Make the Teaching Land

*Take a concept the student would forget and turn it into one they can't unhear. Profile the learner first, then run every concept through the Expert Secrets machine: epiphany story → named model → grounded analogy → proof → do-this-now → the so-what.*

This skill owns **the teaching narrative**: extracting what a course actually teaches, finding where it stays abstract, and rebuilding each concept so the realization happens *in the student*, emotionally, not just on the slide. It borrows Russell Brunson's *Expert Secrets* frameworks as a **teaching methodology** (this is method, not text reproduction).

Boundaries: `course-builder` decides what the course must prove — outcomes, assessment, module order — and hands you the skeleton; this skill makes each concept inside it land. `presentations` turns the landed lesson into a deck, `design` owns the pixels, `marketing` owns the words that sell the course, and a content-audit/review-content pass diagnoses an existing lesson (run it first, bring its findings here — that pass audits, this one rebuilds).

**Teaching ≠ selling.** Brunson's frameworks here serve comprehension and retention. The "sale" you're closing is *belief in the idea and trust in the teacher* — never bolt a pitch onto a lesson.

## Learner grounding (hard gate — read this first)

**Never reframe teaching without a complete learner + audience profile.** Teaching into a void defaults to your AI-median explainer voice — abstract, jargon-true, emotionally dead. An incomplete profile is a hard STOP, not a warning, because everything downstream (which false belief to break, which analogy lands) is derived from it.