Individual skill

receiving-code-review

Use when you have just received code review feedback (human or agent) and are about to act on it — verify each item against the codebase before implementing, and push back with technical reasoning instead of performative agreement

skills/development/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 76ee15b3b90d544cfffa70421a8788fda0f4ebba

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 5, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
48
Repository last updated
Nov 5, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Receiving Code Review

Receiving code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance. This skill governs
what happens **between** getting feedback and typing the first edit — not how to produce a review.

**Core principle:** Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Technical correctness over
social comfort.

## When to Use

- You just received review comments (from a human, `code-review`, `review`, or
  `pr-multi-perspective-review`) and are about to act on them
- Feedback includes multiple items and some are unclear or only partially understood
- A suggestion seems plausible but you have not yet checked it against this codebase