Individual skill
claudex-second-opinion
Suggests a cross-model second opinion after substantial or risky code changes. Use when a significant implementation, refactor, security-sensitive change, or uncertain bug fix has just been completed and is about to be committed or shipped. Advisory only — it recommends running /claudex:verdict; it never invokes Codex on its own.
plugins/claudex/skills/claudex-second-opinion/SKILL.md
Source commit 5bd4f168edf7c18a8303cbfde20708ff62aabc4d
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 4, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 998
- Repository last updated
- Aug 12, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-code-commands Repository topic
- claude-code-hooks Repository topic
- claude-code-mcp Repository topic
- claude-code-plugin Repository topic
- claude-code-subagents Repository topic
- awesome-claude-code Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- awesome-resources Repository topic
- awesome-plugins Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
- security Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 2,072 bytes
Read excerpt
# ClauDex Second Opinion
## Overview
When a change is substantial or risky, suggest a cross-model review with
`/claudex:verdict`. Two frontier models trained by rival labs have *different*
blind spots — when both flag the same line it's the strongest free review
signal there is, and where they disagree is exactly where a human should look.
**Hard rule: never run `codex` yourself under this skill.** A cross-model
review spends the user's Codex quota and adds real latency. Explicit
invocation is consent — your job here is one well-timed suggestion, nothing more.
## When to suggest