Individual skill
literature-review
Find, verify, and synthesize scientific literature — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Covers grounding claims in real retrieved sources, avoiding fabricated citations, handling retractions, and calibrating confidence to evidence strength.
resources/skills/literature-review/SKILL.md
Source commit 357d1a980056e191f380d0e01ec4fbc7cf529d1b
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 3, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 5,494
- Repository last updated
- Nov 8, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-for-science Repository topic
- local-first Repository topic
- reproducible-research Repository topic
- open-science Repository topic
- ai-research Repository topic
- model-agnostic Repository topic
- scientific-ai Repository topic
- desktop-app Repository topic
- ai-workbench Repository topic
- open-source Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
.catalog_stampasset · 13 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,649 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,649 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,649 byteskernel.pyruns · 21,813 byteskernel.test.tsruns · 685 bytestest_kernel.pyruns · 2,893 bytes
Read excerpt
# Literature review
A literature question has two halves: finding the papers a domain expert would point to, and turning them into something more useful than a reading list — a synthesis that says what's established, what's contested, what's new, and where the holes are. Both halves can fail quietly and look like competent output until someone checks.
## Setup (any agent, no API key)
This is a **pure skill** — `kernel.py` is deterministic Python (plain HTTP/stdlib calls to CrossRef and OpenAlex) and _you_ (the base model) do all the reasoning: the finding, the synthesis, the prose. There is no `host` runtime and no LLM API. Load the helpers once per session in a Python cell:
```python
exec(open("<this skill's directory>/kernel.py").read())
```
Nothing auto-loads it outside Claude Science. Then call the helpers directly — `verify_dois`, `crossref_lookup`, `search_openalex`, `expand_citations`, `extract_dois`, `style_pass`. If a helper name is not defined, you haven't exec'd `kernel.py`.