Individual skill
chai-reviewer
Critique quality framework (CHAI: Accurate/Complete/Constructive): findings must cite artifacts, scan for pattern-mates, propose concrete fixes.
skills-imported/chai-reviewer/SKILL.md
Source commit faf37c0859ebf627bfcb5225e8057d088691e0ae
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 8, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 53
- Repository last updated
- Oct 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-agents-automation Repository topic
- ai-skills Repository topic
- awesome Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- chatgpt Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- meta-ai Repository topic
- muse-ai Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
LICENSE-NOTE.mddoc · 614 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 25,594 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 25,594 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 25,594 bytes
Read excerpt
# Reviewer — Meta Skill
## When to Use
After completing any pipeline stage's work — before checkpointing. You are the quality gate between "work done" and "work accepted." This skill replaces the Python reviewer class with an instruction-driven self-review protocol.
Every stage gets reviewed. No exceptions. The review quality determines whether the final video is worth watching.
## Critique Quality (CHAI Rules)
> Findings ≠ critiques. A finding identifies a problem; a critique tells the next stage how to fix it. The CMU/Harvard CHAI study ("Building a Precise Video Language with Human-AI Oversight", arXiv 2604.21718v2) showed that critique quality, measured on three axes, directly governs downstream output quality. Apply all three to every reviewer pass.
>
> **Accurate.** Every finding must reference a concrete artifact field, line number, or visible asset frame. Forbid hallucinated criticism — if you cannot point to where the problem is, you are guessing.
>