Yila-AI/awesome-research-skills

# Academic Humanizer

Remove the template voice, not the scholarship. Make academic prose more specific, natural, and recognizably the author's while preserving the research exactly.

This Skill improves writing quality. It does not certify that text is human-written, optimize for an AI detector, or remove an author's obligation to disclose AI assistance under the relevant journal, institution, or funder policy.

## Load only what is needed

- Always read `references/preservation-and-evidence.md`, `references/pattern-catalog.md`, and `references/output-contract.md`.
- Read `references/voice-calibration.md` only when the author provides writing samples or explicitly asks to match their voice.
- When source and revision are available as local text, use `scripts/check_invariants.py` as a deterministic first check. A passing result never replaces the semantic audit.

## Use this Skill when

# Research Presentation

Turn a paper or research corpus into a presentation that an audience can follow, verify, and discuss. The core promise is **paper to slides without losing the evidence**: preserve source meaning, choose a cumulative narrative, make figures legible, keep claims bounded, and deliver an editable deck with notes and a rendered QA trail.

This Skill owns the workflow from source inspection through final slide QA. It does not replace the author's scientific judgment, invent results, or silently strengthen a claim.

## Route the request

Choose the narrowest route that satisfies the request:

| Input / request | Route |
|---|---|
| One or more PDFs, papers, or manuscripts | Full paper-to-slides workflow below; read `references/paper-extraction.md` first |
| Research notes, tables, figures, or a protocol | Evidence-led presentation workflow; mark unsupported fields instead of filling them |

# SCI/SSCI Academic Polishing

Polish the writing, not the science. Improve clarity, precision, coherence, concision, and disciplinary register while treating the author's evidence and claims as immutable unless the author explicitly authorizes a substantive change.

## Load only what is needed

- Always read `references/invariants.md` and `references/output-contract.md`.
- Read `references/rhetorical-routing.md` when polishing a complete section or when the section type is known.
- Read `references/corpus-method.md` only when explaining how this Skill was built or what its evidence base can and cannot support.

## Inputs

Accept either:

# Science Research Writing

Turn the author's research materials into the next useful manuscript deliverable. Guide the writing process without replacing scientific judgment or inventing intellectual content.

## Load only what is needed

- Always read `references/input-output-contract.md` and `references/certainty-and-claim-strength.md`.
- Read `references/reverse-engineering-protocol.md` when target papers are supplied or the user requests journal adaptation.
- Read only the relevant section reference: `introduction.md`, `methods.md`, `results.md`, `discussion.md`, `conclusion.md`, `abstract.md`, or `title.md`.
- Use `assets/section-function-map.md` for planning, `assets/evidence-ledger.csv` for provenance-sensitive drafting, and `assets/target-journal-model.json` for target-paper modeling.

## First response: inspect before asking

Read all supplied materials first. Identify: